Use Case

Security assurance

A look at what Security Assurance is, the challenges, and how the Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform fits in.

What is security assurance?

Security Assurance is the practice of verifying and validating that the security tools, processes, and architecture of a security program accurately and effectively enforce the organization’s security policy.

What are the benefits of security assurance?

Security teams implementing a security assurance (or Cyber Defense Assurance Program – CDAP) approach realize the following tangible benefits:

  1. Risk Reduction – CDAP helps organizations identify vulnerabilities and weaknesses in their cyber defenses, allowing them to proactively mitigate risks before they are exploited by malicious actors.
  2. Compliance Adherence – Many industries have regulatory requirements regarding cybersecurity. CDAP assists organizations in ensuring compliance with these regulations by implementing appropriate controls and measures.
  3. Enhanced Detection and Response Capabilities – By establishing robust monitoring and incident response procedures, CDAP enables organizations to detect and respond to cyber threats more effectively, minimizing the impact of security incidents.
  4. Improved Stakeholder Confidence – Demonstrating a commitment to cybersecurity through a comprehensive CDAP can enhance trust and confidence among customers, partners, and other stakeholders, safeguarding the organization’s reputation.
  5. Cost Savings – Investing in proactive cybersecurity measures through CDAP can potentially save organizations significant costs associated with data breaches, downtime, regulatory fines, and legal liabilities.
  6. Continuous Improvement – CDAP is not a one-time effort but rather an ongoing process of assessing, improving, and adapting cybersecurity measures based on evolving threats and organizational needs. This continuous improvement cycle helps organizations stay ahead of emerging cyber risks.
  7. Streamlined Operations – By standardizing cybersecurity practices and protocols across the organization, CDAP can streamline operations and ensure consistency in security measures, making it easier to manage and maintain cybersecurity infrastructure.
  8. Cybersecurity Awareness and Training – CDAP often includes cybersecurity awareness and training programs for employees, raising their awareness of common threats and best practices for maintaining security, thereby reducing the likelihood of human error leading to security incidents.

Overall, a well-designed Security Assurance Program can provide organizations with a structured framework for managing cybersecurity risks effectively, ultimately contributing to their resilience in the face of cyber threats.

What are the five stages of a security assurance function?

A Security Assurance Program typically involves several stages aimed at establishing, maintaining, and continuously improving an organization’s cybersecurity posture. While specific methodologies may vary depending on the organization’s size, industry, and regulatory requirements, the following stages are commonly included:

The five stages of a continuous threat exposure management function are:

  1. Assessment and Planning
  2. Design and Implementation
  3. Monitoring and Detection
  4. Response and Recovery
  5. Review and Improvement

Stage One: Assessment and Planning

  • Conduct a comprehensive assessment of the organization’s current cybersecurity posture, including existing policies, procedures, technologies, and controls.
  • Identify assets, vulnerabilities, threats, and potential risks to the organization’s information systems and data.
  • Define the goals, objectives, and scope of the Cyber Defense Assurance Program.
  • Develop a cybersecurity strategy and roadmap based on the assessment findings and organizational priorities.

Stage Two: Design and Implementation

  • Develop and implement cybersecurity policies, procedures, and controls aligned with industry best practices, regulatory requirements, and organizational goals.
  • Deploy cybersecurity technologies and solutions to protect critical assets and data, such as firewalls, intrusion detection/prevention systems, encryption, endpoint protection, etc.
  • Establish incident response procedures, including roles and responsibilities, escalation paths, and communication protocols.

Stage Three: Monitoring and Detection

  • Implement continuous monitoring mechanisms to detect security incidents, anomalies, and unauthorized activities in real-time.
  • Utilize security information and event management (SIEM) systems, intrusion detection systems (IDS), and other monitoring tools to analyze network traffic and log data for potential threats.
  • Conduct regular security assessments, vulnerability scans, and penetration testing to identify and remediate weaknesses in the cybersecurity defenses.

Stage Four: Response and Recovery

  • Develop and maintain an incident response plan outlining the steps to be taken in the event of a security incident or breach.
  • Establish a dedicated incident response team trained to handle cybersecurity incidents effectively and efficiently.
  • Implement procedures for containment, eradication, and recovery following a security incident, including data restoration and system reconfiguration.

Stage Five: Review and Improvement

  • Conduct periodic reviews and audits of the Cyber Defense Assurance Program to assess its effectiveness and identify areas for improvement.
  • Analyze incident response metrics, lessons learned, and root causes of security incidents to refine cybersecurity policies, procedures, and controls.
  • Stay abreast of emerging cyber threats, vulnerabilities, and best practices, and incorporate lessons learned from security incidents into future cybersecurity strategies.

By following these stages, organizations can establish a robust Cyber Defense Assurance Program that helps protect against evolving cyber threats and ensures the resilience of their information systems and data.

What are the challenges in building a security assurance program?

Building a Cyber Defense Assurance Program (CDAP) can be challenging due to various factors. Some of the key challenges include:

  1. Resource Constraints – Limited budget, manpower, and technical expertise can hinder the development and implementation of a robust CDAP. Organizations may struggle to allocate sufficient resources to cybersecurity initiatives, leading to gaps in defense capabilities.
  2. Complexity of Threat Landscape – The evolving nature of cyber threats, including sophisticated malware, advanced persistent threats (APTs), and zero-day vulnerabilities, poses a significant challenge to cybersecurity efforts. Keeping pace with emerging threats and vulnerabilities requires continuous monitoring and adaptation of defense measures.
  3. Technological Complexity – Organizations often operate in complex IT environments comprising diverse technologies, platforms, and interconnected systems. Integrating and securing these disparate components within a unified CDAP framework can be daunting, particularly for large enterprises with legacy infrastructure.
  4. Compliance and Regulatory Requirements – Meeting regulatory mandates and industry standards for cybersecurity, such as GDPR, PCI DSS, HIPAA, etc., adds complexity to CDAP implementation. Ensuring compliance with evolving regulations while maintaining effective cybersecurity controls requires dedicated efforts and resources.
  5. Cybersecurity Skills Gap – The shortage of skilled cybersecurity professionals is a pervasive challenge faced by organizations worldwide. Recruiting and retaining qualified personnel with expertise in areas such as threat detection, incident response, and security analysis can be difficult, hindering CDAP effectiveness.
  6. Vendor Management and Supply Chain Risks – Organizations increasingly rely on third-party vendors and service providers for critical IT functions. Managing the cybersecurity risks associated with these external partnerships, including supply chain vulnerabilities and vendor security posture, requires proactive risk assessment and monitoring.
  7. User Awareness and Training – Human error remains a leading cause of security incidents, emphasizing the importance of cybersecurity awareness and training programs for employees. Ensuring that users are educated about common threats, phishing scams, and best practices for cybersecurity hygiene is essential for CDAP success.
  8. Balancing Security and Usability – Striking the right balance between security measures and user convenience is a perennial challenge in cybersecurity. Implementing overly restrictive security controls may impede productivity and user satisfaction, while lax controls can expose the organization to greater risks.
  9. Cyber Insurance and Risk Transfer – Assessing and mitigating cyber risks through insurance policies and risk transfer mechanisms is becoming increasingly important for organizations. However, navigating the complexities of cyber insurance coverage, policy terms, and claims processes can be challenging without specialized expertise.

Addressing these challenges requires a multifaceted approach, including strategic planning, investment in technology and human resources, collaboration with stakeholders, and a commitment to continuous improvement and adaptation to the evolving threat landscape.

How can Nagomi help teams with security assurance?

Improving your scores across ransomware, phishing, or toward a specific campaign is just the beginning of the journey with Nagomi. The greatest challenge lies in ensuring that once you’ve implemented relevant changes, tweaks, and improvements to your security program, your organization remains resilient amidst the ever-changing threat landscape and the dynamic movements of assets.

Time and again, we’ve heard that configuration drift poses one of the most significant challenges. Nagomi ensures that even seemingly minor gaps or changes in coverage and effectiveness are consistently identified and promptly addressed. This provides CISOs with the confidence that the policies and controls they believe to be in place are indeed functioning as intended. Moreover, Nagomi consistently provides teams with visibility into the changes made within an organization and their impact on the overall threat protection.

By highlighting the improvements made by security teams, enhancing the overall threat protection score, as well as identifying changes in the threat landscape, TTP usage, new policies, and configuration drift that may degrade their scores, CISOs can be assured that they are effectively managing their security program at all times.

Nagomi helps cybersecurity teams make their security tools more effective against real-world threats. By connecting to the tools that customers already have, the Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform maps threats like ransomware, phishing, and insider threat to specific campaigns, then analyzes defenses to provide prescriptive, evidence-based remediation plans to reduce risk and maximize ROI.

More like this

Use Case

Cyber defense planning and optimization (CDPO)

A look at what CDPO is, the challenges, and how the Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform fits in.

Learn more ->

Use Case

Breach and attack simulation (BAS)

A look at what Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) is, the benefits, challenges, and how the Nagomi Proactive Defense differs from BAS.

Learn more ->

Use Case

Proactive security

A look at what Proactive Security is, the challenges, and how the Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform fits in.

Learn more ->

Ready to get started?

Schedule a personalized demo with Nagomi Security or start a risk-free 30 day trial to see what it can do for your organization.